As a Dedicated Capitalist, Yet Medicare for All Represents the Optimal Hope for American Healthcare

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because political disagreements regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many our government's military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.

Sally Rodgers
Sally Rodgers

A seasoned gaming enthusiast with over a decade of experience in online casino analysis and strategy development.