🔗 Share this article

Prosecutors informed the court that law enforcement had reasonable suspicions that Tommy Robinson's mobile held information related to terrorist activities when they detained him in the previous year as he tried to depart from the UK.

Denial to Give Device Pin

The far-right activist, whose real name is Tommy Robinson, allegedly refused to hand over his phone pin to officers, stating it contained “journalistic material.” This happened after he was intercepted at the Eurotunnel on July 28, 2024.

Prosecution Claims on Anti-Terror Authority

On the final day of the trial, prosecutor the prosecution stated that the counter-terrorism powers employed by law enforcement are intended to permit intelligence gathering. She asserted that police had valid grounds to believe Robinson still have links to right-wing groups, even after the dissolution of the English Defence League (EDL).

While his affiliation of the English Defence League has ceased, his views have not gone away. He is known for holding those views and therefore it is a valid concern to believe that on his telephone there could be information pertaining to terrorist acts,” she informed Westminster magistrates court.

The prosecutor continued, “His beliefs – to which he is allowed – were not the focus for their concern on 28 July. It was his connection to individuals who are possibly involved in illegal actions.”

Circumstances of the Stop

The activist had turned up alone at the Eurotunnel in a silver Bentley owned by a acquaintance and was on his way to the holiday destination of Benidorm with more than £13,000 in a carry-on, the trial was told.

The funds was reportedly from a donation drive to cover costs from organizing a large demonstration that occurred the day before in Trafalgar Square.

Legal Team Submissions

Robinson, who denies failing to comply with anti-terror laws during the incident on 28 July of the previous year, faces up to three months in prison or a possible £2,500 fine if convicted.

His lawyer, Alisdair Williamson KC, said in final arguments that anti-terror officers who stopped his client had engaged in a “fishing expedition” and that he had been illegally held.

Citing testimony from police who said they contacted “partner agencies” after detaining him, Williamson said this was a allusion to the security services and that no evidence had been offered from MI5 to indicate his client was a terrorist.

Williamson said the police intervention was biased” because it was based to a “significant degree on a personal attribute.” He said that the main factor” on the choice to stop him was “‘oh look, it’s Tommy Robinson”.

He noted that police had used an “extraordinary power that needs to be carefully regulated” to try to find out details that was already known. The barrister suggested that his client traveled to the resort frequently, which should have reduced the officers’ concerns about him.

Legal Costs and Judgment Timing

Robinson claimed that his court expenses in the case were being covered by Elon Musk, the proprietor of X and Tesla, who has appeared as an ally of the campaigner and lately addressed a rally arranged by him in the capital via a livestream.

A proposed date of the following Tuesday for the decision was altered by the district judge, the judge, after Williamson said Robinson was due to be a invitee of the Israel's administration from Wednesday and would not return until 25 October.

{“I wouldn’t trouble you if this was a trip to Benidorm. I would ask him to rearrange it but he is a guest of a foreign government,” stated the barrister.

Goozee said he would deliver his verdict on the start of 4 November.